Field Engineering Report: Implementation of Collaborative Robotics in Stainless Steel Fabrication – Istanbul District
Project Ref: IST-SS-2024-08
Location: Dudullu Industrial Zone, Istanbul, Turkey
Lead Engineer: Senior Welding Engineer
1. Executive Summary of Field Operations
This report outlines the technical deployment and performance evaluation of a heavy-duty Cobot Welding Machine within a high-output stainless steel fabrication facility in Istanbul. The primary objective was to transition from manual GTAW (TIG) to semi-automated Collaborative Robotics to address throughput bottlenecks in the production of maritime-grade SS-316L heat exchangers. The findings confirm that the synergy between the Cobot Welding Machine and human oversight significantly reduces the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) while maintaining the aesthetic requirements critical to the Turkish export market.
2. The Integration of Collaborative Robotics on the Shop Floor
In the cramped, high-density industrial layouts typical of Istanbul’s Dudullu district, floor space is at a premium. Traditional industrial robots require extensive safety fencing and light curtains, which were non-viable for this facility. Collaborative Robotics provided the solution through integrated force-torque sensors and PLe (Performance Level e) safety ratings.
The deployment demonstrated that “collaborative” does not mean “low power.” We integrated a 10kg payload arm with a specialized torch package. The synergy here is found in the “Lead-Through Programming” feature. Unlike traditional 6-axis robots that require complex G-code or CAD-to-Path software, the Cobot Welding Machine allowed the local Istanbul technicians—many of whom have decades of manual experience but limited coding background—to physically move the arm to weld points. This reduced setup time for new part geometries from eight hours to approximately forty-five minutes.
3. Technical Specifications of the Cobot Welding Machine
The unit utilized is a high-torque variant designed for the rigors of industrial environments. Key specifications observed during the field test include:
- Reach/Payload: 1300mm reach, allowing for full coverage of large-diameter SS flanges.
- Power Source Integration: Digital communication via EtherCAT with a 400A pulse-capable inverter.
- Wire Feed Precision: 4-roll drive system optimized for 1.2mm SS-316L filler wire.
- Interface: Tablet-based HMI with specialized “Welding Wizards” for parameter input.
4. Critical Application: Stainless Steel Welding Parameters
Stainless Steel welding presents unique challenges regarding thermal conductivity and coefficient of expansion. In Istanbul’s humid maritime climate, atmospheric contamination of the weld pool is a constant risk.
4.1. Heat Input Management
During the commissioning phase, we observed significant warping in 3mm SS plates when using manual TIG. By switching to the Cobot Welding Machine utilizing a Pulse-Spray transfer mode, we tightened the arc column. The collaborative system maintained a constant travel speed of 45 cm/min, which is impossible to sustain manually with 100% repeatability. This consistency resulted in a 30% reduction in total heat input, effectively eliminating the need for post-weld straightening.
4.2. Shielding Gas and Porosity Control
We implemented a 98% Argon / 2% CO2 mix. A “Lesson Learned” in this Istanbul facility was the impact of cross-drafts from the workshop’s ventilation. Because the Cobot Welding Machine operates at higher travel speeds than a human, the gas lens must be oversized to ensure the trailing edge of the weld remains shielded during solidification. We moved to a #12 ceramic cup with a specialized diffuser to maintain laminar flow at 15 L/min.
5. Synergy Between Human Expertise and Collaborative Robotics
The term Collaborative Robotics is often misunderstood as “replacement.” In this field application, the “Synergy” was realized through a “Pilot/Co-Pilot” workflow. The master welder (The Pilot) sets the penetration depth and oscillation width, while the Cobot Welding Machine (The Co-Pilot) executes the grueling 2-meter long linear welds.
In the Istanbul workshop, we observed that the “Cobot” handled the monotonous, repetitive fillet welds on the interior of the tanks, while the human welder focused on complex nozzle fit-ups and final QC. This hybrid approach led to a 40% increase in “Arc-On Time” per shift.
6. Lessons Learned: Challenges and Solutions
6.1. Local Power Grid Fluctuations
Istanbul’s industrial zones can experience voltage drops during peak afternoon hours. We found that the Cobot Welding Machine‘s controller was sensitive to these fluctuations, occasionally causing “Joint Position Errors.”
Solution: We installed a dedicated industrial UPS and a 1:1 isolation transformer. This stabilized the 24V DC control circuit and the 400V AC power source, ensuring the Collaborative Robotics software didn’t crash mid-seam.
6.2. Wire Feeding of Soft SS Alloys
Stainless Steel welding wire (ER316L) is stiffer than aluminum but prone to “bird-nesting” if the conduit is too long.
Lesson Learned: We shortened the torch cable to 3 meters and utilized a Teflon-lined conduit. We also implemented a “Push-Pull” torch system integrated with the cobot’s firmware to ensure consistent wire tension, which is vital for maintaining a stable arc length during the high-speed movements of Collaborative Robotics.
6.3. Grounding and High-Frequency Interference
Initially, the HF (High Frequency) start from an adjacent manual TIG station interfered with the cobot’s touch-screen HMI.
Solution: We improved the common ground for the entire cell and used double-shielded Ethernet cables for the Cobot Welding Machine‘s communication back to the shop floor server.
7. Quantitative Performance Metrics
After 60 days of operation in the Istanbul plant, the data for Stainless Steel welding shows:
- Defect Rate: Dropped from 7.5% (manual) to 0.8% (Cobot). Most manual defects were related to end-of-shift fatigue.
- Gas Consumption: Reduced by 15% due to the optimized “Gas Pre-flow/Post-flow” timers in the Collaborative Robotics logic.
- Consumable Life: Contact tip life increased by 50% due to the stable arc maintained by the Cobot Welding Machine.
8. Recommendations for Future Deployments
For future installations of Collaborative Robotics in the Turkish market, I recommend the following:
- Environment Sensing: Given the dust levels in some Istanbul sectors, ensure the Cobot Welding Machine has an IP54 rating or use a protective “robot suit” to prevent grit from entering the joints.
- Training: Focus training on “Weld Path Optimization.” The bottleneck is no longer the welding speed, but how quickly the operator can jig the next part.
- Stainless Steel Specifics: Always use a dedicated “SS-Only” work zone to prevent carbon steel cross-contamination, even when using Collaborative Robotics.
9. Conclusion
The deployment in Istanbul proves that a Cobot Welding Machine is not merely a tool for high-volume automotive plants. Its true value lies in HMLV (High-Mix, Low-Volume) Stainless Steel welding, where precision and repeatability are paramount. By leveraging Collaborative Robotics, the facility has successfully upskilled its workforce while meeting the rigorous quality standards required for international export. The machine has transitioned from a “new technology” to the “backbone of the shop floor” in under three months.
End of Report
Signed,
Senior Welding Engineer
Advanced Programming: OLP vs. Teaching-Free System
For large-scale gantry welding, manual "point-to-point" teaching is inefficient. PCL offers two cutting-edge solutions to minimize downtime and maximize precision. Understanding the difference is key to choosing the right automation level for your factory.
Off-line Programming (OLP)
OLP allows engineers to create welding paths in a 3D virtual environment using CAD data (STEP/IGES).
- Zero Downtime: Program the next job on a PC while the robot is still welding.
- Collision Detection: Simulates the gantry movement to prevent accidents in a virtual space.
- Best For: Complex workpieces with high repeat rates and detailed weld joints.
Teaching-Free Welding System
Uses 3D laser scanning or vision sensors to "see" the workpiece and generate paths automatically without any CAD data.
- Instant Setup: No manual coding or 3D modeling required; just scan and weld.
- High Flexibility: Ideal for "One-off" parts where every workpiece is slightly different.
- Real-time Adaptation: Automatically compensates for thermal distortion and fit-up gaps.
- Best For: Custom fabrication, repairs, and low-volume/high-mix production.
| Feature | Off-line Programming (OLP) | Teaching-Free System |
|---|---|---|
| Input Required | CAD 3D Models | 3D Laser Scanning |
| Programming Time | Minutes to Hours (Off-site) | Seconds (On-site) |
| Ideal Production | Mass Production / Batch Work | Custom / Single Unit Work |
-

LT240S tube laser cutting machine
-

LT120S tube laser cutting machine
-
Sale

Tank Fillet Welding Machine
$1,000.00Original price was: $1,000.00.$900.00Current price is: $900.00. -
Sale

MAK100 tube laser cutting machine
$5,500.00Original price was: $5,500.00.$5,000.00Current price is: $5,000.00. -

portable plasma air cutting machine
$1,200.00 -

2in1 fiber laser cutting machine
-

Air cooling Laser welding machine
-

HF h beam laser cutting machine
-

LT240 laser cutting machine
-

Laser welding machine
-

Cobot Welding Station
-

Gantry welding robot solution
-

Tracked Wheeled AGV Welding robot
-

LFH6020 Fiber laser cutting machine
-

LFP6020
-

robotic welidng machine














One thought on “Engineering Review: Heavy-duty Industrial Cobot Welding Machine – Istanbul, Turkey”
The PCL Laser exceeded our expectations in terms of speed and stability.