Field Report: Implementation of 1000W Laser Welding Cobot in Krakow Tooling Sector
1. Site Overview and Technical Objectives
This report details the field commissioning and performance evaluation of a 1000W Laser Welding Cobot system at a precision manufacturing facility in Krakow, Poland. The facility specializes in the repair and fabrication of high-pressure die-casting molds and injection tooling. The primary objective was to replace traditional Manual TIG (Tungsten Inert Gas) processes with advanced Laser Technology to minimize the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) and reduce post-weld machining time.
The Krakow site presents a unique challenge: high-mix, low-volume production requiring frequent re-tooling. Traditional fixed-cell automation was deemed too rigid. The solution implemented was a 6-axis collaborative robot integrated with a 1000W continuous wave (CW) fiber laser source, equipped with a wobbling head to accommodate varying joint tolerances.
2. The Synergy of Laser Technology and Collaborative Automation
The integration of a Laser Welding Cobot represents a shift in how we approach precision joining. In the Krakow workshop, the synergy between the fiber laser source and the cobot’s kinematics allows for a degree of thermal control that manual operators cannot achieve. Laser Technology provides a high power density, which translates to a narrow, deep-penetration weld profile. When this is coupled with the steady travel speed of a cobot, the result is a consistent energy input per linear millimeter.

During the first week of implementation, we observed that the cobot’s ability to maintain a constant focal distance—even across complex 3D geometries—maximized the efficiency of the 1000W output. Unlike manual laser welding, where hand tremors can cause fluctuations in power density, the Laser Welding Cobot ensures the beam remains at the optimal keyhole or conduction mode threshold. This stability is critical when working with the sensitive alloys common in Polish industrial hubs.
3. Tool Steel Welding: Metallurgical Considerations
The core of this field application focused on Tool Steel welding, specifically H13 and D2 grades. These materials are notoriously difficult to weld due to their high carbon and alloy content, which increases the risk of cold cracking and the formation of brittle martensite in the HAZ.
3.1 Thermal Gradient Management
Using the 1000W Laser Welding Cobot, we were able to utilize the “wobble” function—oscillating the beam in a circular or “C” pattern. This technique effectively widens the weld pool and slows the cooling rate slightly compared to a static laser beam, without the massive heat input of TIG. For Tool Steel welding, this is the “sweet spot.” We successfully repaired a 50mm thick H13 mold insert with a 0.8mm depth requirement. The resulting hardness profile showed a significantly more gradual transition from the fusion zone to the base metal, reducing the need for aggressive pre-heating (standard 250°C was reduced to 150°C).
3.2 Distortion Control
A major “lesson learned” in Krakow was the reduction in peripheral distortion. In Tool Steel welding, excessive heat leads to warping that can ruin a mold’s tight tolerances. The Laser Technology utilized here allows for a “cold” weld process relative to the mass of the part. By programming the cobot to execute short, intermittent beads at high travel speeds (15mm/s), we maintained the base metal temperature below the critical transformation point, preserving the original temper of the tool.
4. Technical Specification and Parameter Matrix
The following parameters were established as the baseline for H13 Tool Steel welding during the Krakow trials:
- Laser Power: 850W – 950W (CW)
- Wobble Frequency: 150Hz
- Wobble Width: 1.2mm
- Travel Speed: 12mm/s
- Shielding Gas: Pure Argon at 15L/min (using a coaxial nozzle)
- Focus Position: -0.5mm (slightly subsurface for better wetting)
5. Real-World Application: The Krakow Workshop Environment
Krakow’s industrial sector is increasingly moving toward “Industry 4.0” standards. The implementation of the Laser Welding Cobot fits this trajectory by providing digital repeatability. In the workshop, the cobot was mounted on a heavy-duty mobile trolley, allowing it to be moved between different mold-repair stations. This mobility is a significant advantage of the cobot over a standard industrial robot.
The interaction between the technician and the Laser Technology is also safer. We utilized a Class 4 enclosure, but the cobot’s force-sensing capabilities allowed the operator to “hand-guide” the robot to the start point of a complex tool repair, dramatically reducing programming time. This “lead-through” programming turned a 2-hour setup into a 15-minute task.
6. Lessons Learned from the Field
6.1 Gap Bridging and Fit-up
One hard lesson learned during the second week involved fit-up tolerances. While Laser Technology is precise, it is unforgiving of gaps. Tool Steel welding requires near-zero gaps if filler wire is not used. We found that for gaps exceeding 0.2mm, the 1000W system required an integrated wire feeder. Adding the wire feeder to the Laser Welding Cobot increased the payload on the arm, requiring a recalibration of the cobot’s joint tension to prevent vibration at high speeds.
6.2 Shielding Gas Dynamics
In the Krakow facility, we initially faced oxidation issues on the weld surface. We discovered that the standard nozzle was creating turbulence at the 12mm/s travel speed. By switching to a custom-designed trailing shield—easily carried by the cobot’s high-torque wrist—we were able to maintain an inert atmosphere over the weld until the temperature dropped below the oxidation threshold for tool steel.
6.3 Surface Preparation
Laser Technology is highly sensitive to surface contaminants. Tool Steel often has residual oils or oxides from the machining process. We learned that even a microscopic layer of coolant could cause porosity in the laser weld. The protocol was updated to include a two-step solvent cleaning process followed by a localized “laser cleaning” pass at low power (200W) using the cobot before the actual welding pass.
7. ROI and Efficiency Analysis
The transition to the Laser Welding Cobot in the Krakow site has yielded measurable results. The rework rate on Tool Steel welding projects dropped from 14% (manual TIG) to less than 2%. More importantly, the time spent on post-weld grinding and polishing was reduced by 60%. Because the laser deposit is so close to the final “net shape,” there is less excess material to remove.
From an engineering perspective, the 1000W power level proved to be the ideal balance for the tooling industry. It provides enough energy for deep penetration in H13 steel while remaining compact enough to be cooled by a standard internal chiller, maintaining the system’s mobility within the Krakow shop floor.
8. Conclusion and Future Scaling
The Krakow implementation proves that a Laser Welding Cobot is not just a tool for high-volume automotive lines, but a surgical instrument for the tooling and die industry. The synergy of Laser Technology and collaborative movement addresses the inherent difficulties of Tool Steel welding by providing a stable, low-heat-input solution that is easily programmable.
Moving forward, we recommend the integration of a vision-based seam tracking system. While the cobot is repeatable, the variation in manual mold placement can be accounted for more efficiently with a “find and weld” sensor package. This will further enhance the Krakow facility’s capacity to handle the most complex tool steel repairs with minimal human intervention.
Engineer’s Final Note: The 1000W system is the “workhorse” for this sector. Any more power would risk excessive HAZ in delicate molds; any less would sacrifice the speed that makes the cobot ROI attractive.
Advanced Programming: OLP vs. Teaching-Free System
For large-scale gantry welding, manual "point-to-point" teaching is inefficient. PCL offers two cutting-edge solutions to minimize downtime and maximize precision. Understanding the difference is key to choosing the right automation level for your factory.
Off-line Programming (OLP)
OLP allows engineers to create welding paths in a 3D virtual environment using CAD data (STEP/IGES).
- Zero Downtime: Program the next job on a PC while the robot is still welding.
- Collision Detection: Simulates the gantry movement to prevent accidents in a virtual space.
- Best For: Complex workpieces with high repeat rates and detailed weld joints.
Teaching-Free Welding System
Uses 3D laser scanning or vision sensors to "see" the workpiece and generate paths automatically without any CAD data.
- Instant Setup: No manual coding or 3D modeling required; just scan and weld.
- High Flexibility: Ideal for "One-off" parts where every workpiece is slightly different.
- Real-time Adaptation: Automatically compensates for thermal distortion and fit-up gaps.
- Best For: Custom fabrication, repairs, and low-volume/high-mix production.
| Feature | Off-line Programming (OLP) | Teaching-Free System |
|---|---|---|
| Input Required | CAD 3D Models | 3D Laser Scanning |
| Programming Time | Minutes to Hours (Off-site) | Seconds (On-site) |
| Ideal Production | Mass Production / Batch Work | Custom / Single Unit Work |
-

LT240S tube laser cutting machine
-

LT120S tube laser cutting machine
-
Sale

Tank Fillet Welding Machine
$1,000.00Original price was: $1,000.00.$900.00Current price is: $900.00. -
Sale

MAK100 tube laser cutting machine
$5,500.00Original price was: $5,500.00.$5,000.00Current price is: $5,000.00. -

portable plasma air cutting machine
$1,200.00 -

2in1 fiber laser cutting machine
-

Air cooling Laser welding machine
-

HF h beam laser cutting machine
-

LT240 laser cutting machine
-

Laser welding machine
-

Cobot Welding Station
-

Gantry welding robot solution
-

Tracked Wheeled AGV Welding robot
-

LFH6020 Fiber laser cutting machine
-

LFP6020
-

robotic welidng machine














One thought on “Engineering Review: 1000W Laser Welding Cobot – Krakow, Poland”
The Tube Cutting Machine exceeded our expectations in terms of speed and stability.